Skip to main content

Oracle Ups The Ante - Does the Salesforce Empire Strike Back?

Clash of the Titans
Clash of the Titans
The fall conference season is in full swing. Of the big 4 we had Oracle Open World and the SAP Hybris Summit, with Dreamforce, SAPPHIRE, and Microsoft Connect() still to come.
I have covered the SAP Hybris Summit, so do not need to say much about it anymore. The event was short on great announcements – maybe they will come at SAPPHIRE – but certainly contributed to showing the clear vision forward that SAP has.
And it is a compelling and consistent vision.
OOW 17 was a different beast, most notably with the announcement of Oracle 18c.
A year ago Oracle took Amazon full on, declaring it enemy number 1. Many analysts, including myself, were confused about this. Why Amazon and not Microsoft? After all Microsoft is the company that has a very credible IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS. Add the operating system and productivity software and you have a company with a formidable software stack that can be on the winning side of a Clash of Titans.
While CTO Larry Ellison still took pot shots at Amazon in his keynotes, one can come to the conclusion that these are a kind of diversion, and that Oracle is back in best Musashi style.

Oracle steps up its IaaS game

The AI driven automation of Oracle 18c is game changing in the database play, and hence in IaaS.
The new container engines should bring Oracle’s cloud on par with AWS and Azure.
All three, Microsoft, Salesforce, and SAP now have something to chew upon.
SAP, because their databases are now lacking a real important argument. And that has an impact. SAP, for example, should feel more heat when it comes to HANA, the only database that is supported for S/4.
Salesforce, being a big Oracle customer itself should feel some pressure when it comes to who they partner with when deciding about additional data centers. Faster and cheaper than AWS is a pretty compelling argument.
Along with the full software stack and the IaaS capabilities Microsoft is taken full on. After all Microsoft is Oracle’s competition when it comes to business workloads.

Oracle has arrived in the Cloud world

It looks like Oracle’s Fusion project has finally brought a suite of cloud native business applications. This means that all big vendors now can concentrate on coercing their customers from an on premise world into the cloud world – not that Salesforce needs to do that, but you get the point. And with the claim that business applications run fastest (and cheapest) in the Oracle cloud there is quite an interesting argument out there.
This is less a problem for Microsoft and SAP, as they have customers using their suites, which tends to be a good defensive line.
However, it is a real problem for Salesforce with a focus on the wider area of CRM, without own database capabilities and with a low focus on IaaS.

Oracle has understood that AI in itself is not of value

Oracle now seems to consequently put the business purpose of AI and machine learning into the foreground. AI in itself is nothing. It is a tool that needs to be brought to a use. There are more and more ‘prebuilt’ AI (and IoT) applications that are intended to deliver business value. This gets emphasized by applying machine learning to the database itself and to the security software. Add conversational capabilities to the software and a story emerges.
Oracle has closed the gap to the competition in this area and is at least ahead of SAP in the conversational department. SAP still relies on partnerships although it has the technology in place.

Now, what does this mean for Salesforce?

Last year’s big thing was Einstein, which was a clear statement about the importance of transparently embedding AI into business applications. Salesforce being a company that time and again proved that it is able to set the pace for the whole industry, it can be expected that there will be some relevant announcements.
And there need to be, because Salesforce is in a tight spot. Probably for the first time in its history.
·      The platform needs a renewal
·      The company does not have the infrastructure capabilities that the competition has. Here clearly Microsoft and Oracle have the edge.
·      Salesforce depends on Oracle’s database, which means subsidizing the competition. On top of this Oracle just announced that Salesforce applications will not run on their best performance, as they are not running on Oracle hardware (AWS is not using Oracle HW, as far as I know).
·      At the core Salesforce is a CRM company. This leaves a lot of important processes out of scope. And, being a CRM guy myself, I’d argue that it is far simpler to replace a CRM system than an ERP system.
·      With its focus on CRM a lot of the data that is necessary for well running, AI driven IoT applications is missing. I’d say that SAP has the lead here with a staggering 76 per cent of all transactions touching SAP systems. Salesforce is comparatively week in first party data management.
·      Salesforce lost out on LinkedIn, didn’t pull through with Twitter (the price was agreeable too high), and now additionally got put on the back foot with SAP acquiring Gigya. This seriously limits their profiling and therefore recommendation capabilities.
·      The company buys growth on the expense of profitability. Sooner or later investors will not accept this anymore.
Given this, ‘ticking off accomplishments promised and now delivered’ will not be enough.

A Way Forward

In my eyes, Salesforce’s biggest strength is the ecosystem, which the company probably let erode somewhat. At least I heard a few statements of Salesforce software partners that Salesforce doesn’t really seem to care anymore. If the same company then says that it is easier to deal with SAP that is telling.
So, I would expect Salesforce doing something around partnership, probably getting closer to the gold standard: Microsoft. There also could be some partnership announcements around strengthening industry solutions, also to cover the challenge described next.
Supporting this, there should need some strong moves in the platform area. The big 4, as well as some other companies, are striving to become the fabric that permeates a business, and connects it to its suppliers and customers. Salesforce is strong on the customer side only, which opens up a weak spot that needs to be guarded.
Second, up to now Einstein seems to be embedded mainly in point solutions. What in this case is missing is a number of engines. For example an engine that can power profiling and recommendations across clouds. But one can think of a good number of intelligent helpers for salespeople as well.
In general I’d expect some high profile announcements around machine learning, bots and, hopefully, conversational interfaces – ideally interactive voice interfaces. I didn’t hear much of Bob Stutz in the past 1.5 years, and cannot imagine that he idled.
Maybe we are in for a surprise. So, lets look forward to Dreamforce 2017.


Comments

Last Year's Top 5 Popular Posts

More Nimble News

The NewsIn the past 5 weeks or so, there have been quite a few news items about Nimble, with the biggest product news dated September 28 and the most interesting business development dated October 11. The headlines include Nimble’s deeper collaboration with Microsoft and its channel partners, as well as product innovations intended to increase the value delivered to Office 365- and G Suite users. In particular, Nimble: ·Now integrates with Circleback, an AI-powered contact capture and cleaning tool as well as their business card scanner. Nimble is now able to extract high quality contact information from email signatures and to add it to the Nimble contact record. This way it becomes easier to keep contact information current. ·Has partnered with NeoCloud. NeoCloud is a managed cloud services company that deploys and manages Office 365. The company now bundles Nimble into all its Office 365 deals and thus offers business applications on top of its infrastructure- and productivity-focused…

SAP CRM for S/4HANA - News from the Customer Frontier

It has been a little more than half a year now that I didn’t update on what is going on with SAP CRM and S/4HANA (which I will refer to as S/4 from now on; SAP it is time for you to change the unwieldy name to something more manageable). What Happened – So FarAs you are well aware SAP is working on integrating a simplified version of SAP CRM into S4. The original roadmap offered a first customer release of an integrated product in early 2018, based on the September 2017 release of S4. The integration was planned as an add-on to S4. The initial scope of this CRM add on for S/4 was supposed to cover what is referred to as ‘core service’ functionality. This initial release shall be followed by ‘core sales’ functionality later in 2018. 2019 then is supposed to be dedicated to another round-off release covering further sales and service functionality, including loyalty management and migration tools. Roadmap and statements also so far have been fairly fuzzy about the strategic distinction b…

SAP CRM into S/4HANA - Did SAP Hit Bulls Eye?

After having talked with Volker Hildebrand about the future of SAP CRM and whether or not there will be a CRM component in S/4HANA at CRM evolution 2017 I now had the chance to follow up with some folks back at SAP in Walldorf. A little RecapVolker told me that, unsurprisingly, SAP is working actively on adding CRM functionality into S/4HANA. In fact, they are merging SAP CRM into it. This is in my eyes meanwhile also the preferred of the two possible options; the other one would be marrying SAP Hybris C4C into S/4HANA. This is the approach which I originally preferred as it would lead to a cleaner code base. I changed my mind, putting customer friendliness reasons over technological cleanliness. The main advantages of merging SAP CRM into S4/HANA over SAP Hybris C4C are that this approach a)Opens a future roadmap for current SAP CRM customers that stretches beyond 2025. These customers else are at risk of defecting. b)Provides the continued chance for customers to run their SAP instance…

CustServ Solutions - Why Choose One Over The Other?

For a while now I am contemplating about why companies choose one customer service solution over another. After all the market is pretty crowded. Vendors have a hard time to differentiate themselves. Just looking at G2Crowd one finds 88 Help Desk Solutions. Larger organizations are likely to be influenced by Gartner’s Magic Quadrant on Customer Engagement Centers or the Forrester Wave on Customer Service Solutions. Smaller organizations are probably looking more at the new breed of peer-to-peer review sites, like the aforementioned G2Crowd or GetApp, TrustRadius, Capterra and others. Many companies conduct research and establish an RFP process to determine the best fit; some see a bottom-up approach from team level to corporation. A kind of ‘shadow IT’ emerges to solve a team’s particular problem. This solution over time could get corporate blessing and may even become the main solution. A clear and reliable roadmap is mandatory for all vendors, so no difference here. Same for share of m…